📢 Gate Square Exclusive: #PUBLIC Creative Contest# Is Now Live!
Join Gate Launchpool Round 297 — PublicAI (PUBLIC) and share your post on Gate Square for a chance to win from a 4,000 $PUBLIC prize pool
🎨 Event Period
Aug 18, 2025, 10:00 – Aug 22, 2025, 16:00 (UTC)
📌 How to Participate
Post original content on Gate Square related to PublicAI (PUBLIC) or the ongoing Launchpool event
Content must be at least 100 words (analysis, tutorials, creative graphics, reviews, etc.)
Add hashtag: #PUBLIC Creative Contest#
Include screenshots of your Launchpool participation (e.g., staking record, reward
What Trends is doing is making the content itself an asset that can be recorded, recognized, and incentivized.
Every post you make says: "Who am I, what do I care about, what kind of content universe do I want to enter."
Suddenly thought of a term > "Equity Binding of Content"
My understanding is:
The content itself is not only a consumable work but can also be a holdable proof of rights, with its value growth tied to the creator, the platform, and even the readers/audience.
Similar to turning content into a "dividend-bearing share."
Some logic of thinking:
1. Content = Tradable Assets
Creator content is no longer just something to glance at; it can be held, transferred, and profit-shared through forms such as NFTs and protocol-native assets.
2. Binding = Incentive Consistency
If I hold an equity stake in a creator's content, I hope it will be read, spread, and commercialized by more people. Therefore, I will proactively participate in spreading it, amplifying its voice, and even engage in co-creating the content.
3. Growth = Win-win for holders
Once the content goes viral, the earnings can be distributed to the creators and early supporters of the content (such as readers, reviewers, and publishers), which means:
Everyone is "bound" in the future of content.
trend is good @trendsdotfun